She says "not everybody's lifestyle is equal just like not all religions are equal." Ok I'm wondering what she means by this. We are all equal!!! That is the entire founding premise of our nation. That "all men are created equal" what in the world is she thinking? Even in the bible it talks about how we should treat one another and no where in that text does it say to treat anyone as less than. So I can understand her comments regarding all religions being equal but that is wrong as well. She may think that her religion is the top dog of religions which is fine and understandable. I would hate to think that anyone is practicing a religion that they don't think is the best one for them. But no religion is higher than another in this country because we all have something that is also guaranteed us in the Constitution called freedom of religion and separation of church and state though kooks like this woman don't seem to have full grasp of the Constitution. I would bet you my paycheck that if you had a pop quiz on the Constitution from a legal standpoint this woman with fail it big time.



Kerns equal bible religion practicing Constitution legal fail

Oklahoma Republican Representative Kerns Homosexual Hate Speech Quote 14

She says "I am not anti... I am not gay-bashing... but according to God's word that is not the right kind of lifestyle." Ok obviously this woman can read but she has a bit of a comprehension problem. If you review the bible you will find that the New Testament basically (for lack of a better way of putting it) makes the Old Testament null and void as anything other than a historical document. This means that ALL of the laws of Leviticus and others are no longer valid. If they were then she would be breaking the law by having pierced ears, short hair, shaved legs, eating shrimp, having sex on her period, not washing herself with charred ox bone etc. When people argue about the homosexual lifestyle based on the bible they most frequently quote from Leviticus in the same texts that are right next to the ones they are breaking, and when asked in separate conversations why they are breaking those laws they will tell you that those laws are no longer valid and that you have to take them in context of what was going on at that time historically. Yet, for whatever reason they forget their own words when speaking of homosexuality. Goofballs incapable of comprehension apparently because they cannot figure out that the laws of the old testament do not apply since the new testament came about and they cannot figure out that the old testament that they refer to when arguing against homosexuality is the same old testament where you can reference the laws that they are also breaking.



Kerns comprehension Old Testament Leviticus bible laws context homosexuality New Testament reference