Yeah!!!!!! First I hear Ellen d. on her show announcing that she plans to get married and now Takei is getting married too. 71 year old Mr. Sulu is getting married to his long time partner Brad Altman. They have been together for 21 years. It's about damn time. Speaking of the sanctity of marriage. These two have been together for longer than my parents and a hell of a lot of other "already been married" people. If I keep having to write stories about cheating wives conning their husbands into killing the other man, or nasty pervert assholes sleeping with teenagers then why in the hell can't we let people get married?

married Takei Mr. Sulu partner Brad Altman sanctity of marriage

WOW!!!! I can't believe that any doctor would really do this. I'm all for everyone in the world having freedom, but I have to admit that I have a limited point of view on who should have complete freedom and who should not. I don't think that children should be given complete freedom until they are legally adults. I think that our job as a society is to protect children from neglegence and harm and to give them certain freedoms without first giving them the coping skills and deductive reasoning to deal with such freedoms is irresponsible of us. I also think that there is much to be said about what our bodies go through as we grow and I definitely don't support messing with this process until it is complete. We all know that doing certain things can damage young bodies. In puppies for example if you take them on long jogs when they are just little puppies you chance damaging particular muscle groups etc. that can negatively affect the animal for life. I think it is much the same for human children. I am totally in support of parents supporting their children when they are going through the various stages of gender identity, but I don't support them potentially damaging their bodies. I don't know what else to say but that.

doctor freedom children adults society protect coping skills deductive reasoning bodies gender identity damage

The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday to strike down two laws that had limited marriage unions to those between a man and a woman. The 4-3 decision will make California the second state after Massachusetts to allow same sex marriages. The decision will become effective in 30 days unless the courts grant a stay. Of course it was denounced by the various religious groups who seem to have forgotten that this country's forefathers came here to escape the oppression of the lack religious freedom and freedom in general. Apparently, they believe that our forefathers only wanted white male Christians to have complete freedom in our country. I have to say that I am happy about this decision. I am happy about it not just because I am homosexual and intend to one day marry my current girlfriend, and I am happy about it not just because my current girlfriend and I intend to move to California in the next 2-5 years. I am also happy about it because I believe in complete freedom as long as said freedom does not directly harm another person who is helpless to make decisions for themselves. I feel like people in this world and country do billions of things on a daily basis that I don't agree with on multiple levels, but that is not any reason for me to take away the freedom that they have to do those things. I feel like if someone wants to marry another human being or even multiple human beings and that if all of those people are of sound mind and consent then let them be free to do it. I don't think it is my business to choose for someone else what their life will be like. I don't believe that my view of the world is necessarily the "true" version and even if it is I don't believe I have the right to force that version of the world on others. If no one is being physically abused and everyone is adult and consenting then I figure do as you please. I and many other children on a daily basis are allegedly and proveably damaged emotionally and psychologically by our heterosexual 1 and 2 parent households and their relatives. If we are to protect emotional and psychological well-being of children then we have a lot of people to prosecute as opposed to choosing to persecute only one or two groups of people for what the masses are doing.

California Supreme Court laws limited marriage unions same sex marriages decision religious groups oppression religious freedom Christians homosexual marry girlfriend

In California, a gunman injures 3 people including his wife at a church festival of all places. First, the guy is shooting at his ex wife. The fact that she is an ex wife shows this couple's high regard for the sanctity of marriage - yuck I could simply barf. In addition to that this guys complete obsession with his ex wife apparently led him to attempt to murder her. Again, quite the case for the sanctity of marriage. The fact that these things are going on everywhere and everyday yet with barely an organization or group of activists fighting to protect marriage and the family against these types of cases is offensive to me. Especially, when you consider that church money, tax money, immense amounts of money and time go into a specifically and strategically funded agenda against gay marriage in the name of protecting marriage and the family. If these hypocrits really cared about protecting marriage and the family they would be out in droves fighting idiots like this one who shot up a church function because of his obsession with his ex wife.

California gunman wife church festival shooting ex wife sanctity of marriage obsession murder money taxes strategically funded agenda against gay marriage hypocrits

RYAN SAYS: "R. Kelly isn't furthering any heterosexual agenda, my friend. In fact, he's doing a good job of messing it up. I understand the resentment from the GLBT community regarding the marriage issue, but you need to step back and realize that R. Kelly has nothing to do with gay marriage rights, equal employment protection or anti-bullying laws. He's simply a dumbass who likes to screw kids. Pointing out the obviousness of his sexuality and preferences serves the gay community no purpose (partly because R. Kelly's not married anymore). Frustrations aside, as much as 95% of the general population are heterosexual and in order to get your agenda recognized as a priority, calling us breeders as derogatory slang and pointing out our flaws will only make you appear radical in the eyes of the middle (who you need to convince). Write about the good. Write about your hopes and aspirations. Don't write non-relevant hate speech and wonder why no one listens.

MY RESPONSE: First, I'm not crying over here in my post toasties wondering why no one listens. The hate speech comes in moments of frustration and generally those offended by it give some high and mighty speech about how they don't think treating others the way that they have treated you is the way to go inorder to solve an issue. I would agree with them, but at the same time I find it interesting that when the chance to pay back black people comes in the form of affirmative action people all of a sudden have issues with the use of preferential treatment in regards to hiring and promotion in the workplace. I find it interesting that when a heterosexual realizes they are spoken badly of and labeled with derogatory slang terms to describe them that all of a sudden slang terms are a problem, yet they use them on the daily until it affects them directly. People hate tasting their own medicine so I figure if I let them taste it they may see what minority communities have dealt with for years, and perhaps if they have to deal with it even half as much as minorities do they will think twice before doing it or allowing others to do it around them. As far as Mr. Kelly goes you are right in that he furthers no agenda other than his own, but my point is that when heterosexuals protest and vote against measures that would give homosexuals more equal rights they use arguments about protecting the family and the sanctity of marriage when it is clear they really don't care about that or they would be protesting guys like this one instead of ignoring him and/or sending their kids off to his concerts as well as attending themselves and buying his albums. So you see the point was not not to say that Mr. Kelly is helping any agenda against equality, but that he is doing the opposite yet without the same opposition that we as homosexuals receive on a daily basis. With regards to your statement about Mr. Kelly not being married you are right, but the reason for that is because he failed to protect children, family and the sanctity of his own marriage by sleeping with a child. With regards to your claim that 95% of the population is heterosexual I will simply say that you may want to seek out some actual statistics as opposed to guestimates before stating numbers. Census reports are a good place to start though they do not consider the entire population so it is not completely accurate.

R. Kelly heterosexual agenda resentment GLBTQ marriage gay marriage rights equal employment protection anti-bullying laws dumbass screw kids Frustrations population priority breeders derogatory slang radical good hopes aspirations hate speech crying moments offended high and mighty speech solve issue interesting affirmative action hiring promotion workplace labeled minority protest vote homosexuals equal rights arguments family sanctity of marriage concerts albums equality opposition statistics Census accurate

So once again we witness the heterosexuals of the nation proving they care about the sanctity of marriage and protecting families and children. A new witness has come forward in the R. Kelly Child Porn case. As if it isn't bad enough that some child's parents let them go to an R. Kelly concert unsupervised and stay out all night without monitoring, R. Kelly picked up the child and took them for a sexcapade which he filmed for his viewing pleasure. Now a woman has come forward claiming to have been involved with a much enjoyed threesome with Kelly and the youngster. Which is worse... The parents, R. Kelly, or the Woman in the threesome? For some reason these are the things heterosexuals do in public and blatantly while all of us pay our taxes toward the fighting of the case against them and yet they somehow think that giving homosexuals the right to marry would not protect the sanctity of marriage and the family. People who think this should be put face to face with what heterosexuals have done for marriage and family and then rethink it. I say you can't have your cake and eat it too. If you really truly want to protect marriage and the family then perhaps you should be more vigilant against ALL of those who discredit your agenda by damaging the image of what you are so politically protecting. Lastly, I want to say to any of you who support this dude by purchasing more of his music that you should be smacked in the back of your head to reset your brain. He is a child molesting porn maker that likely wouldn't support you without being forced to do so. The only good thing about him is that he makes clear the hypocricy of the heterosexual agenda against equality within this nation.

R Kelly sanctity of marriage child porn pleasure parents heterosexuals family protection

Heterosexuals Protecting the Sanctity of Marriage With Murder

In Fort Worth, TX a woman caused the shooting death of her lover by text paging him to come over to her place while her husband was out. The husband returned home early to find his scantily clad wife screwing the man in his truck outside their house. The woman's fight or flight responses apparently went haywire when she cried rape and jumped out of the vehicle. Devin LaSalle drove of as quickly as possible but not before Darrell Roberson fired 4 shots into the fleeing vehicle killing LaSalle. At first the police arrested and attempted to convict the husband for the murder of LaSalle until they discovered that he was in fact Denise Roberson's lover and that she had invited him to the premises that night. The husband in an attempt to protect his marriage, family and the woman he loved was committing an act of defense in a moment of extreme emotional distress while the wife on the other hand was simply lying for her own self preservation. What a dumb bitch she must be. I'm sure she will make friends in prison quite quickly as she stands to be convicted for up to 20 years. And for some reason they don't want us to get married cause the sanctity of marriage is compromised. I wonder what heterosexual adultry, whoreishness and murder do to protect such sacred rites of passage? I'm sure us homos can't make it much worse than it has already been made by all the screwed up breeders in our society.

Fort Worth husband rape Darrell Roberson murder defense distress prison